Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

SEM Findings on the Dentinal Tubules Changes by Application of the Desensitization Agents

ÀåºÐ½Ç, Á¼ö°æ, ÃÖÀ±È­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀåºÐ½Ç ( Jang Boon-Sil ) - Jeonju Kijeon College Department of Dental Hygiene
Á¼ö°æ ( Jwa Su-Kyung ) - Daegu Health College Department of Dental Hygiene
ÃÖÀ±È­ ( Choi Yun-Hwa ) - Gimcheon University Department of Dental Hysiene

Abstract


Objective: In order to observe and to compare several desensitization agents for dentinal tuble changes, Gluma, MS coat, 2% NaF, 10% SnF2 and SE bond were prepared.

Methods: 5 extracted 3rd Molar were prepared, and devided with 6 pieces per a tooth for 30 specimens, classified them with 6 groups as group 1 as without any treatment, group 2 as applied with Gluma for 3 times, group 3 as MS coat for 3 times, group 4 as 2% NaF for 4 times, group 5 as 10% SnF2 and group 6 as SE bond for a time. SEM observation was done for all specimens for 2 portions per a sample and the number and degree of the obstacle of dentinal tubules were calculated.

Results: It revealed the closing phenomina in all experimental group¡¯s samples were more in numbers of the degree than in control group (p£¼0.05), SE bond group was the most in closing the dentinal tubles and 10% SnF2 group was next, and MS coat, Gluma, and 2% NaF in sequence. There was no significant differences between in each experimental group by one way ANOVA test, with Tuckey or Sheffe test, otherwise there was a significant difference in statistical between in Gluma, 2% NaF and SE bond group by Dunkan test (p£¼0.05).

Conclusion: All experimental group¡¯s agents can be used for desensitization agents in hypersensitive dentin clinically, and SE bond was the most recommended for severe hyper sensitive dental patient.

Å°¿öµå

dentinal tubules; SEM; hypersensitive dentin; desensitization

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI